Framing the web-vs-apps debate either as a zero-sum-game or an it’s-all-internet-traffic argument seems to reflect much larger issues or ‘symptoms’, as Mathew Ingram noted.
The debate ultimately keepsÂ reinforcing my views about the importance of the open Internet.
First, I’m repeatedly reminded how remarkable the network is to enable differentiation like this.Â It would have been impossible to create a system where both things co-existed if you planned it this way.
I mean, how could it be that we agreed to a collection of open standards that were adopted by influential individuals and organizations who helped to scale them in a way that would support the amount of activity happening across the many technologies that have been deployed on top of those standards globally so many years later?
The mind boggles. It also worries. Was it an isolated event? Will it last?
Second, when corporate interests’ self-serving tactics unwittingly blast through our interests as a global society inequality abounds.Â They can be too quick to leave standards bodies behind and often the needs of real people.
There’s obviously nothing wrong with self-serving interests.Â Used the right way that can be the fastest route to solving huge problems collectively. And competition needsÂ to be protected just as the public spaces need to be protected.
But equally we should never be surprised when commercial interests buildÂ marketplaces on top of public spacesÂ and turn those marketplacesÂ into winner-takes-all gamesÂ at the expense of the common benefit of the space. That’s what they do.
And that’s why Obama’s bold position in favor of the Internet-as-utility matters so much.
History’s pendulum of public opinion needs to swing back the other way and help all the things that are caught in the middle of thisÂ push-pull relationship between the commons and the free markets.
Yes, standards and trade orgs and policies can all be slow to form and annoying to work with and incapable of understanding commercial opportunity, but when they do successfully enable marketplaces for us all to benefit from then you get a far healthier environment in the end.
It’s ‘the rising tide lifts all ships’ argument.
While the app market is a commercial variant that may bring some uncomfortable baggage with it into the public spaces, the question that should worry us more is about how we secure the context for this kind of market to happen again and again.
My reading of the web-vs-apps debate is that we have yet more reason to strengthen and fight for open network principles in the world.
If the current spacesÂ failed to move fast enough for mobile marketplaces to form the way they probably should have been formed using open standards then what can we do now to ensure the public spaces underpinning the next network can support it for the benefit of all?
Does the “Internet of Things” have a strong enough commons-based underpinning to support the wave of commercial activity flooding it now, for example? Or is the race to establish inequality and win the whole thing too far gone already?
The network model we have now that includes the web and apps and many protocols most people don’t even know about might just be a once-in-a-generation slice of magic. But it might also be a principle used by future generations to build new markets.
I’m hopeful it’s the latter. It’s certainly not too late for that.
Maybe the debate can evolve into a constructive conversation about the “network we want”.
(Btw – Yes, I realize I’m late to this meme. I’m trying to get my blogging pace back up again. Not sure if I can do that or not yet.)