The Internet’s secret sauce: surfacing coincidence

“It looks like serendipity, and in a way it is, but it’s manufactured serendipity.” #

All these services allow me to manage fragments of my life without requiring burdensome tasks. They all let me take my data wherever I want. They all enhance my data by connecting it to more data. They all make my data relevant in the context of a larger community. #

“Coincidence is the noteworthy alignment of two or more events or circumstances without obvious causal connection.” #

This is, of course, similar and related to the definition of serendipity: #

“Serendipity is the effect by which one accidentally discovers something fortunate, especially while looking for something else entirely.” #

You might say that this is a criteria against which any new online service should be measured. Though it’s probably so core to getting things right that every other consideration in building a new online service needs to support it. #

This entry was posted in behavior, community, creativity, data, delicious, design, dopplr, edge, flickr, future, ideas, innovation, internet, models, network effects, platform, programmableweb, recommendations, social media, strategy, transparency, trends, twitter, visualization, web services, wesabe and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to The Internet’s secret sauce: surfacing coincidence

  1. this reminds me of this essay by Lindsay Marshall:

    http://vielmetti.typepad.com/vacuum/2007/05/lindsay_marshal.html

    http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Lindsay/Writing/serendip.html

    “We are not, I believe, looking for tools to record our thoughts or to provide them with structure. What we seek is something that leads us to the unforeseen collisions, the copulations that lead to new thoughts, new connections and yet more new meetings.”

  2. Pingback: Weblog

  3. Colin says:

    Great post, Matt! I love the idea of surfacing coincidence. It’s interesting that the services you highlight (Dopplr, Wesabe, Twitter, Flickr, and del.icio.us) seem to have added this layer of meaning on top of fairly specialized data, at least initially (finance, photos, short text, etc). The larger, catch-all social networks don’t seem to have reached this level as clearly – is that a function of the more complex/vague data, the ways that people use those networks, or something else? Can serendipity be achieved by a ‘one-stop’ or aggregating network? One would think that the extra data can only help, but perhaps this isn’t the case.

  4. Hey, I’ve done something that sort of surfaces coincidence with flickr photos with my footsteppr hack: http://bluesmoon.info/hacks/footsteppr/

  5. Perry says:

    Great post…I’ve been using serendipity and discovery for awhile, but your connection to life tools really resonates.

  6. Pingback: Matt McAlister » Local news is going the wrong way