Think of all the millions of words written by news organizations around the world about Abu Ghraib during 2004. Now go to Google and search (as suggested in the Wired article above) for Abu Ghraib, and you will find only a handful of traditional media outlets mentioned in the first few pages (fortunately, the Guardian is one). This isn't just a quirk in Google's search algorithm; this is about traditional media ceding responsibility for providing the definitive, permanent record of major events.
All that reporting effort, all that insight and expertise, all those contacts: now completely invisible to the millions who decide to use Google as their first and final tool for researching.
Chris Anderson's influential essay, The Long Tail (now a blog and forthcoming book) explains how in a world without the traditional physical restrictions of high street space, online retailers can offer vast and diverse repertoires, brought to life through recommendation systems and other links. They still need their best sellers, but the future success of their businesses really depends on the long tail.
The same is true for news sites. Freed from the physical restrictions of print, now is the time to see our Web operations not simply as the place for today's news: but as the repository for everything we have ever done. Yes, we need big breaking news, but it's the long tail of your content accumulated over time that makes you distinctive and lets you stand out.
|
||||||||
|
(Email, IM or mobile)
![]() Month Archive
Login
about
LinkedIn ProfileMy PersonalDNA TailRank Memes My Megite email: mattmc AT yahoo DASH inc DOT com ![]() |
Interesting perspective on the role of Online News in a Google-driven conversational world
From Jay Rosen's PressThink:
Comments
No comments found.
|
|||||||



Digg
Comment